Vivien-Leigh.com Blog
  • Archives
  • August29th

    Oscar Berger was a famous cartoon artist and writer. While promoting one of his books, My Victims, a book explaining the art of drawing caricatures, he dropped by backstage to visit with the Oliviers. And, of course, to draw their caricatures. Do you think they were victims?


    Possibly anticipating the result, Sir Laurence Olivier looks rather pensive as he gave this sitting. What would this artist see in him?



    The caricature of Sir Laurence, which shows that he had every justification for looking pensive!



    Still wearing stage makeup, Vivien poses backstage.



    Full use of Vivien’s pointed chin and upturned nose make for this piquant study.
  • July10th

    This blog post is Vivien-Leigh.com’s participation in the awesome Vivien Leigh and Laurence Olivier Appreciation Blogathan. To check out the other posts made by other fabulous blogs around the Internet, check out this link. Big thanks to Kendra of VivandLarry.com for organizing this event.

    People often think Vivien Leigh was Scarlett O’Hara. There definitely is a strong case here. Scarlett is the heroine we love to hate; she is attractive, forward thinking, and manipulative. And she often gets what she wants… except Rhett. Vivien Leigh was beautiful (bordering on goddess gorgeousness), forward thinking, and manipulative. She too often got what she wanted… except Laurence Olivier? Vivien shrugged at the comparison and once said: “I hope I’ve one thing that Scarlett never had. A sense of humor. I want some joy out of life. And she had one thing I hope I never have. Selfish egotism.”

    In fact, people also compare Vivien to other roles she played… what about Vivien’s first film performance after her divorce from Laurence Olivier, Roman Spring of Mrs Stone? Karen Stone is a fading actress who agonizes over being alone and growing old. She’s hopeless. Or what about Vivien as Mary Treadwell in Ship of Fools? Mary Treadwell, a divorced woman who enjoys her alcohol to numb herself, tells a fellow passenger about her ex-husband, “Oh we put up a wonderful front in public. We were everybody’s favorite couple.” And later she continues explaining, “He was the most promising. The most handsome. He had the most glorious facade. A facade was all there was. He made me the best known wife of the best known skirt chaser in the community. I made life hell for him. It ended in divorce courts.” Makes you wonder, doesn’t it? Why did she play these roles? Did these roles hit too close to home? Or was it all just a coincidence? Maybe Vivien was not like any of these roles at all. I found an article asking this very question. “Deadly is the Female,” by Jeri Jerome, says that Hollywood remembered the ruthlessness of Scarlett and expected Vivien Leigh to be like her. But was she? I’d love to hear your thoughts on this!

    It was the first day of production on “Streetcar Named Desire.” Over at Warner Brothers, the entire lot was keyed with expectancy, for a great picture was about to roll. Director Elia Kazan was set to go. The publicity department was geared for action. Even the gaffers and grips shared in the excitement of the first day.

    The entire supporting cast of the New York production to the West Coast. There was Marlon Brando, sensation of “The Men,” Kim Hunter, Karl Malden, and –the start of the picture—Vivien Leigh.

    Everyone watched her as she came on the set. They noticed her friendliness, her slight British accent, her laughter. They noted her resemblance to Hedy Lamarr, even with the blonde wig she was wearing for the part of Blanche. There was no doubt Vivien’s appearance caused more than the usual excitement due a star. Her husband, Laurence Olivier, busy at Paramount on “Carrie,” had filled her dressing room with flowers. It was like opening night at a theater. This doesn’t often happen in Hollywood where pictures begin and end with steady monotony. But this was more than a first night; it was the triumphed return of Scarlett O’Hara after an absence of ten years.

    The memory of Scarlett lingered, like an uneasy ghost, over the Warner lot. Scarlett had been ruthless. She had been deadly—and deadly is the female. Was Vivien deadly, too? Would she be difficult to work with? Weren’t there stories, went the whispers, that she had been “hard to handle” ten years ago, “difficult” with the press, “temperamental”?

    As walked on the set, oblique glances went her way. She was tinier than most people thought she would be, ethereal and dainty. She looked like a flower, poetic as that sounds. Her face had been made to look older. Lines had been drawn in. A deep shadow of rouge gave her face an unnatural thinness. She was no longer the tempestuous Scarlett; she was the defeated and pathetic Blanche of “Streetcar.”

    The tension on the set began to ease. People looked at each other and grinned. Vivien Leigh wasn’t Scarlett after all. She was an actress.

    Read More | Comments

  • February19th

    Welcome to the conclusion of VIVIEN: A Portrait in Depth, written by Alan Lloyd. I hope you’ve enjoyed the article and learned something new! And if you did learn something new, tell me about it! Or, if you have a comment about something the author said, please share. Thanks for reading!

    ___________________________________________________

    In Hollywood, David O. Selznick was testing one famous actress after another for the coveted role of Scarlett O’Hara in his monumental production of Gone with the Wind. Not convinced that any of them was perfect, he eventually started filming with the part unfilled.

    Vivien judged that the time was right.

    Spectacular preparations had been made for a gigantic bonfire to represent the burning of Atlanta by night. Flying to America, she drove out to the location with Olivier and his agent, and there, at one o’clock in the morning, her hair streaming in the breeze and the flames of “Altanta” in her eyes, Vivien made her bid for the part that brought her world-wide fame.

    Once again, the duet of beauty and determination proved infallible. There were few things that couldn’t be done—with a fight.

    Laurence Olivier was less sure. He saw popularity as a limiting factor in his work. In the early days, he didn’t much like his audience. He even felt that an actor had a certain connotation of absurdity. He was liable to hunch silently over his lunch while she chatted, his thought in another world.

    “Things are apt to crowd in on one,“ he has said. “Then selfishness creeps in, and one keeps saying: I can’t, I can’t, I can’t.”

    But Vivien lived by the creed of “I can.”

    When Olivier, in a bleak mood, told her, “Fate doesn’t like us,” she retorted, “I’ll make it like us.” And, usually, she got her way.

    Read More | Comments

  • February18th

    Welcome to the fourth installment of VIVIEN: A Portrait in Depth. My discussion question for today is: Do you agree with this part of the article: “Vivien and Larry Olivier were drawn by the bond of complementary opposites. She was vibrant, impulsive, delicately beautiful; the inspired woman determined to be a great actress. He was strong and dreamy-eyed with immense reserves of talent; the inspired actor anxious to be a successful man” ?

    ___________________________________________________

    Waiting for a taxi in the lobby of the Savoy Hotel one day, Vivien was introduced to a twenty-eight-year-old actor named Laurence Olivier. A little over middle height, trimly built with broad chest and shoulders, he gave her an immediate impression of depth and power.

    He was not handsome in the conventional sense. His hair was too low on the forehead, his eyebrows shaggy, he had a cleft chin and the wide, wistful mouth of a Daumier clown. But his deep-set, grey-blue eyes were compelling. Lazily lowering the lids over a smiling glance, Olivier could somehow create intimacy at first sight.

    A few weeks later she was invited to a house party at his home near Iver, Bucks. Meeting at other parties followed.

    It was in 1936 that fate, in the person of Sir Alexander Korda, brought Vivien and Larry Olivier together in the making of a new picture, Fire Over England. Working on romantic scenes in the balmy days of late summer, they learned more of each other and grew closer and closer. “If it be love indeed,” Vivien asked herself in the words of her much-admired Cleopatra, “tell me how much.”

    Read More | Comments

  • February15th

    Welcome to day two of a week-long tribute to Vivien Leigh’s life. VIVIEN: A Portrait in Depth was written by Alan Llyod and the photos included in the series have been chosen by me. I hope every fan, new or seasoned, will learn something new about this talented actress. Yesterday I asked a discussion question to the fans of the Vivien-Leigh.com Facebook page. Feel free to join in over there, or put your comments here on the blog. My question for today is: What do you think is the most courageous thing Vivien Leigh ever did?

    ___________________________________________________
    Not long after her marriage to Laurence Oliver in 1940, Vivien and her husband put their entire savings, £12,000, into a sumptuous New York production of Romeo and Juliet. Eagerly, they rented a large apartment and ordered crates of wine for the celebration. Everything was set for a triumphant opening at the Hollywood Theatre. But when their secretary brought in the paper next morning, they notice she’d been crying.

    “The worst Romeo ever, “said one paper. Another commented that, if the audience was quiet, it was probably because it was fast asleep. The Oliviers couldn’t believe their eyes. But there was nothing unreal about the people demanding their money back at the box-office that day.

    Vivien canceled the wine and looked for smaller apartment. “Fate doesn’t like us,” Olivier told her despondently.

    “I’ll make it like us!” retorted Vivien. “I believe in courage.”

    Read More | Comments